Constructing muslims as a threat
During the so called refugee crises (henceforth labelled the migrationpolitical crisis) a friend of mine posted on Facebook with regard to the death of Alan Kurdi. My friends post were not part of the public outcry, but instead my friend asked what would happened when all the cameras have been turned off. A couple of months later the Swedish government closed its border and the ongoing political crisis partly faded from public memory.
The events of 2015 have been the subject of numerous studies and will probably keep future historians quite occupied. A couple of years ago an article was published, written partly by Ruth Wodak who is one of contemporary scholarship s leading expert on migration. The thesis put forward that notion of the events as a crisis were the result of a politics of fear, were Muslims were deemed as a threat towards both domestic security and the access to welfare. By framing the events as threat media tapped into a common xenophobic view of immigrants.
Similar themes have to a increased degree been discussed in scholarship, since the migrationalpolitical crisis led to a refraiming of immigrants. Since the 1960's refugees have to a large degree been portrayed as the deprived other, people without any resources of their own in need of social support. This notion can be criticized for not giving the group any agency, but it still hold a meaning in the form of forced migration.
In a Finnish study from last year it was showed that refugees during 2015 were described as the undeserving other in Finnish media. For instance the groups use of smartphone and western clothing made them seem like a group trying to get to west by economic rather than humanitarian incentives. Thereby they did not deserve societies proctection nor humane treatment. The fact that Syria previously had been a rather modern country were soon silenced in this debate.
Even though the previous understanding had not been entirely humane this new understanding is however neither humane or in line with the UN charter of refugee rights. But still it gained popularity within the Nordic countries, were on example is the Danish states legislation that gives the state right to confiscate refugees belongings, thus making Denmark less desirable as both arriving and transit country. This legislation is however not in accordance with the basic principle of asylum, which should be granted depending of the threat level rather than individuals economic standard.
If we return to my friends Facebook post, what then did happened when the camera lights were turned off? The short answer is an increased problematization of refugees and a creation of the refugees as undeserving and posing a threat towards Europe. Only time will tell were research eventually will lead us, but it is rather clear that the rise of the fascist movements we see today can be part of a changed political landscape that the media unconciously created during a few months of 2015.
Comments
Post a Comment